Institute for Research on Poverty University of Wisconsin Home Page Skip Navigation
Institute for Research on Poverty
     Home > Research > Child Support > Child Support Policy Research > Publications

Child Support Policy Research Publications

Current Projects | Families Forward | IRP Child Support Research 1982-1992 | Publications
Contract Projects 2003–2005

Reports
IRP Discussion Papers and Reprints
Other Publications

The documents included here consist of reports written under contract to the state of Wisconsin and research papers written by IRP-affiliated faculty and IRP staff in the various child support projects that IRP has fielded over many years.

The reports draw upon a wide range of county, state, and national data. These include IRP data from the Wisconsin Court Record Demonstration Project and the Wisconsin Child Support Demonstration Evaluation (CSDE); administrative data from the State of Wisconsin, such as the State's child support accounting system; and national data on child support enforcement policies and programs such as that available from the Office of Child Support Enforcement in the Department of Health and Human Services. Full texts of many reports are posted on this Web page, below; reports listed here, but not posted in full, may be available upon request.

Researchers associated with IRP have conducted a wide range of studies on child support issues. Much of this research is available in IRP Discussion Papers, Reprints, or Special Reports. Information about these publications, and full texts of many of them, can be retrieved through keyword and author searches using the IRP Publications Database.

Some datasets for IRP child support projects are publicly available. Other IRP-managed data may be available upon request from the archives manager, Maggie Darby at mdarby@ssc.wisc.edu. Reports and other publications produced as part of the CSDE are available at the CSDE Publications page.


Reports


The Regularity of Child Support and Its Contribution to the Regularity of Income
Yoonsook Ha, Maria Cancian, and Daniel R. Meyer, April 2007

Child support is a potentially important income source for a broad set of families. A substantial amount of research has been conducted on the factors associated with the amount of child support paid and received. But for child support to be most effective at helping custodial families meet their expenses, the regularity of support may be important as well. This paper builds on previous analyses and focuses on custodial mothers rather than noncustodial fathers and on receipts, not payments, but it explicitly separates payments from different fathers to provide a more informative measure of regularity. Moreover, it adds a new set of analyses, comparing the extent of regularity of child support to that of several other income sources and to total income, and explicitly examining whether child support is exacerbating or smoothing the irregularity of custodial mothers’ total income package.


Estimating the Costs of Children: Theoretical Considerations Related to Transitions to Adulthood and the Valuation of Parental Time for Developing Child Support Guidelines
Ingrid Rothe and Lawrence M. Berger, April 2007

Wisconsin and many other states use a "continuity of expenditures model" in setting child support policy. The model is based on the concept that children in divorced or never-married families should benefit from expenditures that would have been made on their behalf had they coresided with both of their parents. This report is intended to inform the determination of reasonable child support order policy guidelines using that framework by estimating the costs of children and by evaluating alternative models and theories about how intact, two-parent families allocate resources on behalf of their children. The report makes no firm recommendations about how evolving research on the costs of raising children should affect child support policy, but instead summarizes the research and suggests possible policy implications.


Child Support Income and Copayments in the Wisconsin Shares Child Care Subsidy Program
Steven T. Cook, March 2007

The Wisconsin Shares child care subsidy program provides assistance to low-income families who need help with child care in order to work. Families must meet both financial and nonfinancial eligibility criteria to participate and are expected to pay part of the cost of the child care in the form of copayments that are calculated according to a sliding scale. Currently, child and family support payments are not counted as income when determining financial eligibility or expected copayment amounts. This report estimates the fiscal effect of considering child and family support as income for purposes of calculating Wisconsin Shares copayment amounts, including the effect on families that would retain eligibility but experience higher copayments.


Wisconsin's 2004 Shared-Physical-Placement Guidelines: Their Use and Implications in Divorce Cases
Patricia Brown and Maria Cancian, March 2007

Using Wisconsin Court Record Data (CRD) that IRP has collected in 21 Wisconsin counties, this report studies differences in child support orders and time-share placement before and after significant changes were made to the Wisconsin child support guidelines in January 2004. The new guidelines generally include lower child support orders at lower levels of time-share, and higher child support orders at or near the level of equal shared placement. The authors analyze whether there is evidence that the changes influence parents' behavior and divorce-case final judgments. They find continued growth in shared placement in divorce cases, and declines in both sole-mother and sole-father placement; a greater increase in unequal shared-placement cases; and a long-term trend of declining litigation in divorces cases, in all categories except those with unequal shared placement. The financial incentives introduced by the 2004 guidelines have countervailing effects on the parents with greater and lesser time placement.


Characteristics of Shared-Placement Child Support Formulas Used in the Fifty States
Patricia Brown and Tonya Brito, March 2007

In divorce and paternity cases where separated parents share time with the child equally, where responsibilities for costs of raising the child are shared equally, and where incomes of the parents are similar, most persons would agree that no child support payment is necessary. Conversely, when the time spent with parents is not equal, the incomes of the parents are not equal, or the responsibilities for costs are not equal, most child support policymakers would agree that an order of child support is appropriate. Under these circumstances, however, child support guidelines are needed because it is not intuitively obvious what an equitable child support order would be. This report is an update of a report by Melli and Brown (1994) that explored the use of guidelines in shared placement cases in the early 1990s. In this paper we focus primarily on the mathematics of the various formulas. The paper concludes by recommending a formula which is not difficult to understand and which allows lesser-time parents to sometimes become the child support payee.


Eligibility for Child Care Subsidies of Parents with Child Support Income
Emma Caspar and Steven T. Cook, November 2006

The Wisconsin Shares child care subsidy program provides assistance to low-income families that need help with child care in order to work. Families must meet both financial and non-financial eligibility criteria to participate. Currently, child and family support payments are not counted as income when determining financial eligibility. In this report, we assess the extent to which families participating in the child care subsidy program would be disqualified, were support income considered in calculating eligibility and benefit levels.


The Stability of Child Support Orders
Yoonsook Ha, Daniel R. Meyer, and Maria Cancian, December 2006

Using data mainly drawn from the Kids Information Data System, the report explores the following three questions: (1) How often do noncustodial parents' earnings change over a five-year period? (2) To what extent do child support orders change, and are these changes related to the changes in earnings? (3) Do changes in payments occur over this five-year period, and if so, are the changes linked to changes in earnings, orders or both? Findings suggest that a substantial proportion of fathers experience large changes in earnings in this five-year period; that relatively few of the cases with large changes in earnings have a large change in the amount of child support owed; and that both changes in earnings and changes in the amount of child support orders are strong predictors of changes in payments.


Alternative Approaches to Child Support Policy in the Context of Multiple-Partner Fertility
Maria Cancian and Daniel R. Meyer, December 2006

This report examines possible alternative child support policy approaches in cases where the mother and/or father have children with other partners, simulating the results of different policy regimes on outcomes for families. One purpose of the report is to examine the extent of complications in Wisconsin child support cases that are caused by multiple-partner fertility, to see whether a systematic approach to child support in such complicated cases is called for.


Review of Child Support Policies for Incarcerated Payers
Jennifer L. Noyes, December 2006

This report explores the emerging set of concerns about incarcerated noncustodial parents and whether they should be held to the terms of child support orders given their change in circumstances. The report provides background information about the extent to which NCPs are incarcerated, an outline of major policy and practice options under consideration nationwide, examples of the policies and practices of six states, reviews of the extent to which the outcomes of current policies have been evaluated, and an outline of the implications of the information provided.


Review of Child Support Policies for Multiple Family Obligations: Five Case Studies
Emma Caspar, September 2006

This report describes the child support policies of five states in cases where one or both parents has had children with two or more partners. The collected information also informs the simulation models used in a related report on the outcomes of current and potential alternative policies for families in Wisconsin. The paper examines how five states' child support policies address the question "When a parent has a second family, should the obligation to the first family be reduced, do prior-born children take precedence, or should all children be treated equally?" The five locations included in this study are: North Dakota, the District of Columbia, Colorado, New Jersey, and Montana.


The Use of Wisconsin's Child Support Guidelines: Evidence from 2000 through 2003
Emma Caspar, Ingrid Rothe, and Anat Yom-Tov, July 2006

This report examines child support orders in Wisconsin to determine if they are consistent with the percentage-expressed standard that should be used to set child support orders in Wisconsin. Using a sample of child support cases that entered the Wisconsin family court system, the researchers' findings were mixed. In about 28 percent of the cases, there was no order; 25 percent were below the guidelines; 39 percent are consistent with the guidelines; and 7 percent are above the guidelines.


Recent Trends in Children's Placement Arrangements in Divorce and Paternity Cases in Wisconsin
Steven T. Cook and Patricia Brown, May 2006

Using a sample of cases from 21 counties in the Wisconsin Court Record Data (CRD), this report analyzes the change over time of child placement in divorce and paternity cases. The researchers found that, although mother sole placement remains the most common arrangement for physical placement of children following divorce, growth in the use of shared mother-father placement is continuing.


Divorced Wisconsin Families with Shared Child Placements
Patricia Brown, Eun Hee Joung, and Lawrence M. Berger, February 2006

Using Wisconsin Court Record data, this report describes the living arrangements of children in Wisconsin families with (equal and unequal) shared physical placements following their parents' divorce, and examines the stability of those placements during the three years after the divorce.


The Father-Child Relationship in Voluntary Paternity Acknowledgment Cases
Patricia R. Brown, February 2006

Using Wisconsin Court Record data, this report examines the effect of voluntarily acknowledged paternity on the relationship between fathers and their nonmarital children in the early years of the child's life. Related report: Patricia R. Brown, Steven T. Cook, and Lynn Wimer, Voluntary Paternity Acknowledgment, IRP DP1302-05.


Alternative Cost-of-Living Adjustments to Child Support Orders: A Simulation Using Wisconsin Orders
Ingrid E. Rothe, September 2004

This report considers the potential effects of implementing an automatic cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) to modify child support awards in Wisconsin. The first half of the report-based primarily on literature reviews, analysis of state child support legislation, and discussion with officials in other states-presents alternative strategies for automated updating of orders that have been contemplated or tried elsewhere. Most of the material in the first half of the report appeared in the author's earlier report, "Alternative Cost-of-Living Adjustments to Child Support Orders," September 2003. The second half of the report analyzes the potential impacts of implementing one of the alternative COLA adjustments in Wisconsin.


Selected Child Support Enforcement Tools: How Are They Used in Wisconsin?
Ingrid E. Rothe, Yoonsook Ha, and Marya Sosulski, August 2004

As part of changes to the child support enforcement system over the past 20 years, state have implemented an expanded set of tools designed to improve enforcement. This paper uses information from survey and administrative data in Wisconsin to better understand how the new techniques are implemented by county child support agencies and whether they contribute to increased collections. Officials in four county child support agencies (Chippewa, Eu Claire, Racine, and Winnebago) were interviewed; the counties exhibited marked differences in organization of the enforcement process. Analysis focused on three types of enforcement actions that were more frequently utilized: enforcement letters, contempt hearings, and Notice of Lien and Credit Bureau Reporting. Use of these tools increased substantially in 2000. The most effective method of initiating payment, in cases of nonsupport, was through wage withholding.

A two-page summary accompanies this report. (Also available in Adobe Acrobat (.pdf) format, 2 pp.)
(pdf, text, 43 pp.; summary, 2 pp.)


Voluntary Paternity Acknowledgment
Patricia R. Brown, Steven T. Cook, and Lynn Wimer, July 2004
[Issued as IRP DP 1302-05, May 2005]

Since the mid-1990s the state of Wisconsin has operated a voluntary paternity acknowledgment process that allows the fathers of nonmarital children born in the state to voluntarily acknowledge their paternity by signing a notarized form, instead of going through a judicial hearing. This report examines the relationship between the use of paternity acknowledgment and two measures of fathers' subsequent participation in the responsibilities of child-rearing: paying child support and having the children live with them. Voluntary paternity acknowledgment, as compared to adjudicated paternity, is associated with a lower incidence of child support orders, higher likelihood of payment when an order exists, and a greater likelihood of shared child placement.

A summary accompanies this report. (Also available in Adobe Acrobat (.pdf) format, 1 pp.)
(pdf, text, 62 pp.; summary, 1 p.)


The Importance of Child Support for Low-Income Families
Maria Cancian, Daniel R. Meyer, and Hwa-Ok Park, September 2003

This report, prepared for the Bureau of Child Support, Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development, uses Wisconsin survey data from the Child Support Demonstration Evaluation to assess the importance of child support for mothers entering the state's Wisconsin Works (W-2) program in 1997-98, its first year. It compares these mothers with a broader group of low-income families from Wisconsin and other states that form part of the National Survey of America's Families (NSAF). Both W-2 participants and those from the NSAF sample experienced consistent improvements in child support over time and across the income distribution, suggesting that a continued focus on improving the effectiveness of the child support system can make a major contribution to the well-being of vulnerable families with children. 14 pp., 9 figs., 3 tables.

A two-page summary accompanies this report. (Also available in Adobe Acrobat (.pdf) format, 2 pp.)


Child Support Orders and Payments: Do Lower Orders Result in Higher Payments?
M-C. Hu and D. Meyer, March 2003

Explores the relationships between income, the amount of child support owed, and the amount of child support paid, using two data sets from Wisconsin: the Wisconsin Court Record Database and the Kids Information Data System (KIDS). There is no evidence to suggest that orders that are "too high" discourage those who owe child support and will result in lower payments. In general, the authors find, fathers with higher orders make higher payments in the first year after the order. (pdf, text, 26 pp.; summary, 2 pp.)


Forgiveness of State-Owed Child Support Arrears
Judi Bartfeld, February 2003

Child support arrears owed by noncustodial parents, and their possible effects on child support agencies, parents, and children are an issue of increasing policy concern. This report provides an overview of the magnitude of arrears, the factors that contribute, and the problems stemming from high arrears, and considers one general policy approach to reducing arrears that have already accrued, the forgiveness of arrears owed to the state. (pdf, 43 pp., SR 84)


Medical Support Orders: Potential Fiscal Effects of Matching Wisconsin Insurance and Child Support Data
Thomas Kaplan and Ingrid Rothe, January 2003

This report explores the practicality and the potential savings to the state from identifying Wisconsin children who have a noncustodial parent with access to affordable health insurance that provides coverage for dependents, and to assure that such children are covered under that plan. The investigation determined that some children now covered by the Wisconsin Medicaid program have noncustodial parents who have health insurance and that savings would be possible if those insurance carriers could be identified and billed as a result of routine data matching. 2003. (Also available in Adobe Acrobat (.pdf) format, text, 8 pp.)


Children's Living Arrangements in Divorced Wisconsin Families with Shared Placement
M. Krecker, P. Brown, M. Melli, and L. Wimer, September 2002 (revised June 2003)

This report sheds new light on the stability of shared physical placement after a divorce and provides useful evidence on the issues raised in the 1992 book, Dividing the Child, by Maccoby and Mnookin. (pdf, 64 pp., SR 83)


Use of Wisconsin's Child Support Guidelines in Shared Placement Cases
Steven T. Cook, August 2002

This report examines the use of the guidelines in shared placement cases, using data from the Wisconsin Court Record Database for two time periods: (1) under the September 1987 standard and (2) under the March 1995 standard. The analysis is limited to divorced parents, because shared placement appeared to be extremely uncommon in paternity cases. The reports estimate compliance with the guidelines for a wide variety of subgroups-by age and income of either parent, by number, sex, and age of children, by length of marriage, by residential location. One of the purposes of the 1995 revision was to address the absence of guidelines in cases where placement is equally shared between the parents, which is now by far the most common outcome in custody cases. Such cases were still much more likely to have no order, or to have orders below the guideline, than were unequal shared cases.

A summary accompanies this report. (Also available in Adobe Acrobat (.pdf) format, 1 pp.) (pdf, text, 24 pp.; summary, 1 p.)


Placement Outcomes for Children of Divorce in Wisconsin
Maria Cancian, Judith Cassetty, Steven T. Cook, and Daniel R. Meyer, January 2002

In considering where children should live after their parents divorce, state law formerly gave explicit preference to the mother. This gender preference has now been removed from law in all states, and shared placement has become more common. In Wisconsin, shared placement became presumptive as of May 2000. This research examines whether these laws are having an effect by examining physical placement outcomes among Wisconsin divorces from 1996 to 1998, compared to divorces coming to court from 1990 to 1993. Between the earlier and later periods, the analysis found a clear move away from mother sole placement, which declined from 74.6 percent to 63.7 percent of cases. Shared placement, both equal and unequal, more than doubled over these 5-6 years. Placement outcomes varied dramatically only when we examined legal representation-whether only one parent (and which parent), both, or neither were represented.

A two-page summary accompanies this report. (Also available in Adobe Acrobat (.pdf) format, 2 pp.)
(pdf, text, 20 pp.; summary, 2 pp.)


Estimates of Family Expenditures for Children: A Review of the Literature
I. Rothe, J. Cassetty, and E. Boehnen, April 2001

This report reviews the existing literature regarding estimates of expenditures for children, discusses the implications for Wisconsin's standard, and identifies areas where future research may be required. (pdf, 51 pp.)


Child Support Disregard Policies and Program Outcomes
J. Cassetty, M. Cancian, and D. Meyer, 2001

This report explores the effects of various levels of disregards on IV-D paternity establishment and child support collections across all states.


The Importance of Child Support in Leavers' Post-Welfare Incomes
M. Cancian, D. Meyer, and C. White, 2000

This report provides new information on the role of child support in contributing to the incomes of women who have left welfare.


Joint Legal Custody and Child Support Payments
J. Seltzer and V. Maralani, 2000

This report addresses the question: Does joint legal custody increase child support payments? It describes differences in formal child support payments for those with and without joint legal custody among divorce cases. It examines legal custody differences through the sixth year after divorce, to assess whether any economic benefits of joint legal custody endure through a significant part of childhood.


Child Support and the W-2 Self-Sufficiency Ladder: Patterns and Implications
M. Cancian and D. Meyer, 1999

This report focuses on the relationship between child support and movement up the self-sufficiency employment ladder by mothers in the W-2 program.


IRP Discussion Papers and Reprints

Below we list only Discussion Papers issued in 2005. There exist many earlier IRP Discussion Papers and Reprints dealing with child support. They can be identified, and full texts of many can be retrieved, through the IRP Publications Database.

Can Administrative Data on Child Support Be Used to Improve the EITC? Evidence from Wisconsin
V. Joseph Hotz and John Karl Scholz, November 2005 (DP 1310-05)

The Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) is the largest cash or near-cash U.S. antipoverty program, but a large fraction of its payments appear to go to taxpayers who are not eligible for the credit. The most common problem has been that EITC-qualifying children failed to live for at least six months with the taxpayer claiming the child. The 1997 and 2001 federal budget bills thus mandated use of the Federal Case Registry of child support orders (FCR) to improve the accuracy of the child support and tax systems. This paper examines the effects of these changes on EITC compliance and participation.

Multiple-Partner Fertility: Incidence and Implications for Child Support Policy
D. R. Meyer, M. Cancian, and S. Cook, May 2005 (DP 1300-05)

The article shows that family complexity resulting from multiple-partner fertility is quite common, and provides the first comprehensive documentation of levels of family complexity among a broad sample of welfare recipients. Multiple-partner fertility has important implications for understanding child support outcomes and for designing and evaluating welfare and family policy.

Child Support in the United States: An Uncertain and Irregular Income Source?
M. Cancian and D. R. Meyer, April 2005 (DP 1298-05)

The U.S. emphasis on private rather than public responsibility for the support of children raises several questions concerning the adequacy and distribution of child support. Using detailed administrative records, the authors analyze child support receipts Wisconsin from 2000 to 2003. They find that most mothers with child support orders receive support, but that the amount received varies substantially from year to year and there is substantial instability within years.

Knowledge of Child Support Policy Rules: How Little We Know
M. Cancian, D. R. Meyer, and K. Nam, April 2005 (DP 1297-05)

The authors find that participants in a Wisconsin child support and welfare demonstration have very little knowledge about child support policy rules. Results suggest that people tend to learn policy rules by experience; there is less consistent support for knowledge being primarily imparted through interactions with caseworkers. The article also discusses the implications of this ignorance for policy evaluations.

Other Publications

Focus Vol. 21:1, Spring 2000, is a special issue devoted entirely to research on child support. Articles cover a number of policy-related topics, among them the development, scope, and consequences of state and federal enforcement efforts, and whether enforcement is likely to make a difference in the relationship between absent parents and their children. Also covered are results of experimental efforts to improve the capacity of absent, low-income fathers to support their children, and perspectives on child support policy in England and Europe as compared to U.S. policies.


Fathers Under Fire: The Revolution in Child Support Enforcement
Irwin Garfinkel, Sara S. McLanahan, Daniel R. Meyer, and Judith A. Seltzer, editors
(New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1998.)

Much of the uncertainty surrounding child support policies has stemmed from a lack of hard data on nonresident fathers. Fathers under Fire presents a full body of information on the financial and social circumstances of these men. Social scientists and legal scholars explore the underlying issues of child support and the potential risks and benefits of stronger enforcement policies.


About IRP | Research | IRP Initiatives | News & Events | Publications
Links | FAQs | Site Map | Search IRP | IRP Home
Please take a minute to evaluate our site: IRP Web Site User Survey

Questions and comments email irpweb@ssc.wisc.edu
Posted: 14 September, 2005
Last Updated: 13 May, 2008 by DD